Another strangles scare has resulted in a trio of horse trainers being banned from racing in New Zealand until October 7. New Zealand Thoroughbred Racing (NZTR) is taking a hard line with this particular outbreak, especially with the upcoming Kelt Capital Stakes premier raceday on October 3. While they're trying to do the right thing to protect the larger racing population, there are a few things going on that simply don't quite add up.
All horses from the affected farms are banned from racing facilities for 21 days after the last known case had run its course (reportedly September 16): That's great, but... 21 days is the isolation period typically used to detect clinical cases of strangles (i.e. exposed horses that get sick will usually do so within 21 days). However, some horses, particularly those recovering from being sick, can shed the strangles bacterium for much longer than this. In order for such a ban to really be effective, horses from the property should also be tested to ensure they are not shedding Streptococcus equi subsp equi before being allowed in more public facilities.
In a press release issued by NZTR on September 23, it is stated that "An isolation period of six weeks is usually necessary to ensure that the disease is not still incubating before ending the isolation.": Why would they make such a statement and then only isolate these properties for three weeks?
The same press release states "...controls have been put in place, as recommended, and this should ensure that the risk of further spread will be effectively controlled." If the NZTR thinks that banning horses from the affected farm and the neighbouring properties from the track is going to eliminate the risk of strangles, they're deluding themselves. As we've said before, strangles is an endemic disease in the horse population, and there are certainly other horses in New Zealand that are carrying strangles. Any time a large group of horses get together there is risk. The best way to reduce the risk is to ensure that simple, practical infectious disease control measures are in place, and followed, every day. Statements like this just give people a false sense of security.
Strangles was initially identified in a horse from a sale that was brought onto the farm over a month earlier. The horse was isolated on September 8 for being sick, and diagnosed sometime in the following week: There are a few good points here. First of all, it demonstrates a classic example of a "normal" carrier animal (the "trojan horse" if you'll forgive the pun) from a sale (making it high risk for carrying infectious diseases) that was brought onto a farm and likely not isolated and tested, ultimately resulting in an outbreak on the farm which is now affecting the ability of all the horses there to race. Classic. Furthermore, this horse from the sale arrived on a truck with several other horses which were delivered to three other properties in the area. There is no indication that these other horses have been tested to see if they are carriers, nor that the other properties have been inspected. Based on the ban that has been slapped on the currently affected property and its neighbours, I could see trainers and owners being reluctant to report any new cases, or even horses with a fever, for fear of the same thing happening to them. Also, I have to wonder, if there was a known strangles case on the index farm since at least last week, why did it take until September 23 for the NZTR to issue the ban?
"...once strangles was diagnosed, all the horses on the Cottle property - minus the infected ones - were vaccinated [for strangles].": Vaccination in the face of an outbreak is actually not recommended according to the strangles consensus statement from the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine. Particularly with a known carrier having been on the farm for a month, by that time all the other horses were likely already exposed, and vaccinating them at that point merely puts another drain on their systems.
"The barn yard was disinfected but the bedding was not replaced.": I've never seen nor heard of a barn yard that could actually be effectively disinfected. It would have to made entirely of sealed wood/concrete or metal, and even then it would be a momentous task and likely still impossible. I don't doubt they gave the area a thorough cleaning, but it was not disinfected. The fact that the bedding was not replaced surprises me - this seems like one of the simpler, easier things to do. While it also can't guarantee a strangles-free stall, any horse that is shedding the bacterium is likely to have highly contaminated bedding, and removing it at least decreases the environmental pathogen burden. The article also states that "the bacteria can survive in bedding and soil for at least eight months." Perhaps under ideal sheltered conditions this may be possible, but a study presented last year showed that in the "real world" S. equi probably only survives in the environment for a few days.
Both the article and the press release do make a few sound recommendations in the end, including adopting hygiene guidlelines such as replacing bedding, disinfecting water troughs and feed buckets and other equipment, avoiding mixing and moving horses, being aware that people are a potential source of cross-contamination, and of course our favorite: "As with any contagious
disease, handwashing is a simple and effective tool."
More information on strangles is available on the equIDblog Resources page and in our archives.
Image: Banned trainer/owner Tim Symes, with his horse Molly O'Reilly (source: www.hawkesbaytoday.co.nz)